If life is the result of a purely naturalistic process, what then of morality? Has it, too, evolved? And if so, of what significance are our concepts of right and wrong, justice and truth?
Society tolerates the practice of the Christian faith in private devotions and in church services, but it increasingly deprecates public witness.
Furthermore, if Dawkins’s question is valid, it can be turned back on him. He believes that the universe created him. Therefore, we are justified in asking him: who created your creator?
Perhaps there is a subtle danger today that, in their desire to eliminate the concept of a Creator completely, some scientists and philosophers have been led, albeit unwittingly, to re-deify the unive...
If the text means that the sun came into existence on day 4, Origen was asking a very reasonable question: If the sun is not yet there, how are we to understand the first three days with their ‘evenin...
Johannes Kepler described his motivation thus: ‘The chief aim of all investigations of the external world should be to discover the rational order which has been imposed on it by God, and which he rev...
Some will take issue, however, with the idea that the resurrection body of Christ is physical, by pointing out that the New Testament itself speaks of the resurrection body as a spiritual body.110 The...
The more we get to know about our universe, the more the hypothesis that there is a Creator God, who designed the universe for a purpose, gains in credibility as the best explanation of why we are her...
The fact that we understand some of the mechanisms of the working of the universe or of living systems does not preclude the existence of a designer, any more than the possession of insight into the p...
God loves an enquiring mind, a fact that has been a great encouragement to me in my study of mathematics and the history and philosophy of science.
So, is naturalism actually demanded by science? Or is it just conceivable that naturalism is a philosophy that is brought to science, more than something that is entailed by science? Could it even be,...
Here we have the basic ingredients that define human beings as moral beings. God has given them the ability to say yes to him by not eating the prohibited tree, and to say no to him by eating it. In t...
The issue between the atheist and the believer is not whether it makes sense to question ultimate fact, it is rather the question: what fact is ultimate? The atheist’s ultimate fact is the universe; t...
Hawking’s inadequate view of God could well be linked with his attitude to philosophy in general. He writes: Philosophy is dead.9 But this itself is a philosophical statement. It is manifestly not a s...
Large evolutionary innovations are not well understood. None has ever been observed, and we have no idea whether any may be in progress. There is no good fossil record of any.’23
The heart of monotheism is that God, who is outside history, is the guarantor of meaning.
Can we ask with Richard Feynman: ‘What is the meaning of it all?’ Or was Bertrand Russell right when he said that ‘The universe is just there, and that’s all’?
We should be humble enough to distinguish between what the Bible says and our interpretations of it.
We are a product of quantum fluctuations in the very early universe.
Naïve
Showing 41 to 60 of 61 results