Harun Yahya Quote
The Tale of Human EvolutionThe subject most often brought up by advocates of thetheory of evolution is the subject of the origin of man. The Darwinist claim holds that modern man evolved from ape-likecreatures. During this alleged evolutionary process, which issupposed to have started 4-5 million years ago, some transitionalforms between modern man and his ancestors aresupposed to have existed. According to this completelyimaginary scenario, four basic categories are listed:1. Australopithecus2. Homo habilis3. Homo erectus4. Homo sapiensEvolutionists call man's so-called first ape-like ancestorsAustralopithecus, which means South African ape.These living beings are actually nothing but an old apespecies that has become extinct. Extensive research done on various Australopithecus specimens by two world famous anatomists from England and the USA, namely,Lord Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles Oxnard, showsthat these apes belonged to an ordinary ape species thatbecame extinct and bore no resemblance to humans.Evolutionists classify the next stage of human evolutionas homo, that is man. According to their claim, the livingbeings in the Homo series are more developed thanAustralopithecus. Evolutionists devise a fanciful evolutionscheme by arranging different fossils of these creatures ina particular order. This scheme is imaginary because it hasnever been proved that there is an evolutionary relationbetween these different classes. Ernst Mayr, one of thetwentieth century's most important evolutionists, contendsin his book One Long Argument that particularly historical[puzzles] such as the origin of life or of Homo sapiens, areextremely difficult and may even resist a final, satisfyingexplanation.By outlining the link chain as Australopithecus > Homohabilis > Homo erectus > Homo sapiens, evolutionistsimply that each of these species is one another's ancestor.However, recent findings of paleoanthropologists haverevealed that Australopithecus, Homo habilis, and Homoerectus lived at different parts of the world at the sametime.Moreover, a certain segment of humans classified asHomo erectus have lived up until very modern times.Homo sapiens neandarthalensis and Homo sapiens sapiens(modern man) co-existed in the same region.This situation apparently indicates the invalidity of theclaim that they are ancestors of one another. Stephen JayGould explained this deadlock of the theory of evolutionalthough he was himself one of the leading advocates ofevolution in the twentieth century:What has become of our ladder if there are three coexistinglineages of hominids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines,and H. habilis), none clearly derived fromanother? Moreover, none of the three display any evolutionarytrends during their tenure on earth.Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which isupheld with the help of various drawings of some halfape, half human creatures appearing in the media andcourse books, that is, frankly, by means of propaganda, isnothing but a tale with no scientific foundation.Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous andrespected scientists in the U.K., who carried out researchon this subject for years and studied Australopithecus fossilsfor 15 years, finally concluded, despite being an evolutionisthimself, that there is, in fact, no such family treebranching out from ape-like creatures to man.
The Tale of Human EvolutionThe subject most often brought up by advocates of thetheory of evolution is the subject of the origin of man. The Darwinist claim holds that modern man evolved from ape-likecreatures. During this alleged evolutionary process, which issupposed to have started 4-5 million years ago, some transitionalforms between modern man and his ancestors aresupposed to have existed. According to this completelyimaginary scenario, four basic categories are listed:1. Australopithecus2. Homo habilis3. Homo erectus4. Homo sapiensEvolutionists call man's so-called first ape-like ancestorsAustralopithecus, which means South African ape.These living beings are actually nothing but an old apespecies that has become extinct. Extensive research done on various Australopithecus specimens by two world famous anatomists from England and the USA, namely,Lord Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles Oxnard, showsthat these apes belonged to an ordinary ape species thatbecame extinct and bore no resemblance to humans.Evolutionists classify the next stage of human evolutionas homo, that is man. According to their claim, the livingbeings in the Homo series are more developed thanAustralopithecus. Evolutionists devise a fanciful evolutionscheme by arranging different fossils of these creatures ina particular order. This scheme is imaginary because it hasnever been proved that there is an evolutionary relationbetween these different classes. Ernst Mayr, one of thetwentieth century's most important evolutionists, contendsin his book One Long Argument that particularly historical[puzzles] such as the origin of life or of Homo sapiens, areextremely difficult and may even resist a final, satisfyingexplanation.By outlining the link chain as Australopithecus > Homohabilis > Homo erectus > Homo sapiens, evolutionistsimply that each of these species is one another's ancestor.However, recent findings of paleoanthropologists haverevealed that Australopithecus, Homo habilis, and Homoerectus lived at different parts of the world at the sametime.Moreover, a certain segment of humans classified asHomo erectus have lived up until very modern times.Homo sapiens neandarthalensis and Homo sapiens sapiens(modern man) co-existed in the same region.This situation apparently indicates the invalidity of theclaim that they are ancestors of one another. Stephen JayGould explained this deadlock of the theory of evolutionalthough he was himself one of the leading advocates ofevolution in the twentieth century:What has become of our ladder if there are three coexistinglineages of hominids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines,and H. habilis), none clearly derived fromanother? Moreover, none of the three display any evolutionarytrends during their tenure on earth.Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which isupheld with the help of various drawings of some halfape, half human creatures appearing in the media andcourse books, that is, frankly, by means of propaganda, isnothing but a tale with no scientific foundation.Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous andrespected scientists in the U.K., who carried out researchon this subject for years and studied Australopithecus fossilsfor 15 years, finally concluded, despite being an evolutionisthimself, that there is, in fact, no such family treebranching out from ape-like creatures to man.
Related Quotes
About Harun Yahya
Between the 2000s and late 2010s, he was engaged in "a massive campaign" of proselytizing Westerners to Islam, producing dozens of vividly illustrated books. On 17 November 2022, he was sentenced to 8,658 years in prison for leading a criminal gang, engaging in political and military espionage, sexual abuse of minors, and other charges. Prior to his arrest, Oktar established and ran two organizations: Bilim Araştırma Vakfı (BAV), which promoted creationism, and Millî Değerleri Koruma Vakfı which worked domestically on a variety of moral issues.
In the West, before his arrest and trial, Oktar sent thousands of unsolicited copies of his creationist book, The Atlas of Creation, to French schools and universities in January 2007, and several months later to American scientists, members of Congress, science museums and schools.
Oktar has advocated a version of Islam that rejects both Sunni and Shia traditions, focusing instead on a Quran-centric interpretation. He has preached "the true Islam" based on the Quran on his television channel, A9 TV. His organization is commonly referred to as a cult. Oktar filed more than 5,000 lawsuits against individuals for defamation from 2005 to 2015, which led to the blocking of a number of prominent websites in Turkey.